From: dohzya <dohzya@...>
Date: 2007-08-02T01:21:42+09:00
Subject: Re: Help:  Get list of modules which are included in the class

> Etienne,
> 
> Thank you very much for this feedback. After thinking about it, here  
> is my take on this:
> 
> We include Module1 in Class1 and so from inheritence this implies  
> that Class2 does not actually include Module1 directly, since it has  
> already been included.  Hence including Module1 in Class2 is  
> effectively a no-op.
> 
> This makes semantic sense, also: "directly_included_modules" should  
> be the modules that self includes which the superclass does not. In  
> this light Module1 is not directly included so my code does what is  
> expected.
> 
> (Also, for the record, Module already has an included_modules method,  
> but I am overwriting because I don't want Kernel listed for my purposes)
> 
> (Thanks to Mark Josef for helping me with this idea)
> 
> --
> Wayne E. Seguin
> Sr. Systems Architect & Systems Admin
> wayneseguin@gmail.com
> 

Thanks :$
Indeed, it's comparable with the difference between 'define' and
'overload' (it isn't?)... moreover it's an overloading with same
method(s) :)
(I'm sorry if I'm repeating anyone, it's hard for me to express myself
and understand correctly in English... I'm working in this way)

--
Etienne Vallette d'Osia