From: James Herdman <james.herdman@...>
Date: 2007-07-27T06:25:34+09:00
Subject: Re: Article: "Why Ruby on Rails Succeeded"

------=_Part_1905_25310069.1185485137574
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Wow.  That kind of makes me a little sad inside.  It never ceases to amaze
me how different the world looks to those of us who aren't so close to
technology.  It makes one wonder what else they're missing in the world.

On 7/26/07, Greg Donald <gdonald@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/26/07, James Britt <james.britt@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The flip side is that many people, to their detriment, believe Ruby ==
> > Rails.
>
> I can easily beat that  :)
>
> Yesterday I had to explain to a friend that if she bought a .net
> domain name, the site she wanted me to build for her didn't have to be
> built using M$ .net technology.  The fact that she had already been
> thinking this was the case for quite some time really shows how
> confused people can become from "news" heard around the 'net.
>
>
> --
> Greg Donald
> http://destiney.com/
>
>

------=_Part_1905_25310069.1185485137574--