From: seebs@... (Peter Seebach)
Date: 2007-07-22T10:21:56+09:00
Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Ruby Editor

In message <20070722005345.GD66157@demeter.hydra>, Chad Perrin writes:
>(leaving aside for the moment the ability to write significant chunks of
>plugin code in other languages -- which I think is present in both, but
>more obvious and common with Vim)

I think emacs is more customizable for one simple reason:  vmlinux.el.

Emacs is an operating system in which someone wrote a popular programmer's
editor.  Vim is an extensible editor.

(Me, I use nvi.  It's not especially extensible, but then, I don't need to
extend it; it does what I want and stays out of my face.)

-s