From: Trans <transfire@...>
Date: 2007-07-20T22:35:44+09:00
Subject: Re: RCR? Added syntax for chains that possibly return nil



On Jul 20, 6:29 am, "Robert Dober" <robert.do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/20/07, Trans <transf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hmm I like the expressiveness of the original proposal
> look at this example
>
>    bar->baz.foo, which has to be written as
>    (bar.baz ||| default).foo
>
> of course one could write
>    bar.baz.foo ||| default
> but it has more permissive semantics and will hide errors that
>   bar->baz.foo
> will raise
> Robert

But where is default in your example? You'd have:

  (bar->baz || default).foo

T.