From: Daniel DeLorme <dan-ml@...42.com>
Date: 2007-07-19T08:01:41+09:00
Subject: Re: Are we cool? method_missing in enumerator

Trans wrote:
> I think I've come up with a good alternative that is safer, but still
> reads well (as of 1.9):
> 
>   arr.map.x + 3
> 
> What do you think?

I'll throw out this idea from a thread not so long ago:

arr.map.it + 3

;)
Daniel