From: Trans <transfire@...>
Date: 2007-07-19T01:11:49+09:00
Subject: Re: Are we cool? method_missing in enumerator



On Jul 17, 7:22 am, "Robert Dober" <robert.do...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/17/07, Robert Klemme <shortcut...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Btw, your sample would be equally simple by doing [1,2,3].map {|x|
> > x+3} - it's even less typing. ;-)
>
> I offer
> irb(main):001:0> require 'labrador/enum'
> => true
> irb(main):002:0> (1..3).map + 3
> => [4, 5, 6]
> irb(main):003:0> (1..3).map(:+, 3)
> => [4, 5, 6]

Yep. This works with my implementation too as of Ruby 1.9+ because the
enumerable methods will return an enumerator if no block is given.

T.