From: Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...>
Date: 2007-07-16T01:33:12+09:00
Subject: Re: graphing/charting application

On 7/15/07, Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 08:01:43AM +0900, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> >
> > On Jul 14, 2007, at 17:05 , Chad Perrin wrote:
> >
> > >I'm hunting around for a simple application that generates images like
> > >bar graphs.
> >
> > Have you taken a look at Gruff? I haven't used it myself, but it
> > seems to be popular. Looks like it can do PNG bar graphs:
> >
> > http://geoffreygrosenbach.com/projects/show/5
> > http://rubyforge.org/projects/gruff
>
> Is there some kind of rule that states that, when something like RDoc is
> available, library developers are disallowed from producing good
> documentation?  I'm constantly frustrated by the fact that many libraries
> figure a skeleton map of available methods constitutes "documentation".

I'm sure that Geoffry would appreciate documentation patches.