From: John Joyce <dangerwillrobinsondanger@...>
Date: 2007-07-11T23:35:55+09:00
Subject: Re: Yield should be renamed call_block


On Jul 11, 2007, at 8:50 AM, Phrogz wrote:

> On Jul 11, 2:37 am, "Robert Dober" <robert.do...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 7/11/07, dbl...@wobblini.net <dbl...@wobblini.net> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Chad Perrin wrote:
>>>> Is the word "accept" being used for anything?
>>> $ ri Proc#accept
>>> Nothing known about Proc#accept
>>
>>> Doesn't look like it :-)
>>
>> Too bad because I could not accept accept ;)
>> Seriously, accept what, to be run?
>> Well if you native speakers think it is good, I will shut my mouth,
>> but it really sounds strange to me.
>
> This native-English speaker concurs: "accept" is not at all a good
> method name for a block/proc to say "please run yourself". Better I
> think is (as I already posted) "run". :) It's both short and
> representative.
>
>
Oh! I like run!! Proc#run()
What about do??? proc#do()
execute
perform
workon
attend
attendto
complete