From: Bertram Scharpf <lists@...>
Date: 2007-07-10T09:10:07+09:00
Subject: Re: Yield should be renamed call_block

Hi,

Am Dienstag, 10. Jul 2007, 08:05:04 +0900 schrieb Yukihiro Matsumoto:
> In message "Re: Yield should be renamed call_block"
>     on Tue, 10 Jul 2007 06:51:03 +0900, Florian Gross <florgro@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> |Currently, it is still possible for the method to check for blocks it
> |doesn't want by itself, though. (raise if block_given?)
> 
> If you check explicitly, yes.  But implicit is better than explicit,
> if you and computer feel same way.

There is a implication uncertainity relation: either
`&block' is implicit or `raise if block_given?' is.

In 95% of my code it's more convenient to have `&block'
implicit. I _feel_ much better with the former.

Bertram


-- 
Bertram Scharpf
Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany
http://www.bertram-scharpf.de