From: Robert Dober Date: 2007-07-06T00:33:15+09:00 Subject: Re: eclipse & subversion On 7/5/07, Logan Capaldo wrote: > On 7/5/07, David Southwell wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 04 July 2007 08:42:06 Gregory Brown wrote: > > > On 7/4/07, David Southwell wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > > > > > I am using eclipse as an IDE and am setting up a subversion server. > > > > > > > > In trying to add subeclipse I get the message: > > > > > > Hi. I don't mind technical non-ruby questions, but it might be polite > > > to use [OT] in your subject to indicate the thread is not about ruby. > > > > This is not OT!! > > > > It is about programming Ruby using a version of eclipse which has been > > developed as an IDE for Ruby Programming. > > > > I am sorry you are confused. > > > > If you had read my Original Post (see below) you will see reference to > > Aptana > > which provides one the extensions that contribute to the IDE especially > > for > > Ruby and Ruby on Rails prpogramming. I assumed those likely to reply to my > > post would be able to both read and understand my OP. > > > > There must be some Ruby programmers who use eclipse as their IDE. If you > > do > > not then I humbly suggest you take a careful look at it. You may find it > > extremely helpful to code in that environment. > > > > David Southwell > > > > > > It is in my opinion off topic. Ruby is only very tangentially related to > your question, you're are not even asking about ruby plugins for Eclipse, > except in the sense you happen to be using them. I also do not mind the > occasional diversion, but I agree with Gregory Brown, it would be courteous > (and easy!) for you to put an [OT] tag on your subject line (or even a > [Slighty OT]). > I strongly disagree with Gregory's and Logan's POV. We had so much more OT stuff, I feel that this is not OT at all, BTW it does not interest me a tiny little bit, but there is a difference between OT and Does not interest me. Furthermore I do not remember any post of bad form or content by David, if you have an issue with David, maybe you can handle it OL? Cheers Robert -- I always knew that one day Smalltalk would replace Java. I just didn't know it would be called Ruby -- Kent Beck