From: Trans Date: 2007-06-25T00:57:39+09:00 Subject: Re: Can't include a module in Enumerable? On Jun 24, 8:01 am, "Pit Capitain" wrote: > 2007/6/24, Trans : > > > Pit Smack Down! You go and solve the Double Inclusion Problem just > > like that!? > > > There must be a large issue. Why wouldn't Matz have already pursued > > this? Granted, I see a little inefficiency, but nothing an Observer > > pattern couldn't mitigate. What say you? > > > I'm Speechless. > > Tom, thanks for the kind words, but it's really not so hard to find > just one solution to this problem. I can't speak for Matz, but I think > he's looking for a more efficient solution that doesn't require a lot > of bookkeeping. Okay, I'm being a bit hyperbolic. But you deserve it anyway. I was surprised to see a solution thrown up in a few lines of code. The impression I had developed over previous discourse was such a thing was not readily possible. Of course, now it seems obvious. I knew we could just re-include the module, I just never put two and two together. T.