From: Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...>
Date: 2007-06-24T06:48:21+09:00
Subject: Re: Named/positional method args

On 6/23/07, Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@gmail.com> wrote:

> Not that I know of but syntactic sugar will be allowed for hash
> definition, which will allow
>
> my_method( :foo => 2, :bar => 10)
>
> to become
>
> my_method( :foo : 2, :bar : 10)

Oh, the new literal syntax is:

{ foo : 2, bar : 10 }

so that'd be my_method( foo : 2, bar : 10 )

But it's supposed to be an addition, not a replacement for the { :foo
=> 2 } syntax.