From: Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...>
Date: 2007-06-16T10:19:40+09:00
Subject: Re: Using extend for initialization settings?

On 6/15/07, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/15/07, Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 6/15/07, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hmm control maybe, you are not forcing anybody to call
> > > f.extend(Container) in your approach.
> >
> > Then just pass the constant into the constructor :)
>
> Huh.. that is exactly what I have suggested, right?
> I asked why #to_module .

Right.  I was basically saying you don't need to_module because if you
wanted to force your object to use some container module, you could
just pass it in.

The .to_module code is gaining you a few chars at most, and I'm not
sure it's worth it for the lack of clarity it introduces.