From: James Edward Gray II <james@...>
Date: 2007-06-13T06:51:54+09:00
Subject: Re: a matter of style

On Jun 12, 2007, at 4:47 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 07:59:10PM +0900, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
>> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007, Anthony Martinez wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2007 at 03:10:49AM +0900, Bas van Gils wrote:
>>
>>> As well, reserve the { } form of blocks to one-liners.
>>
>> That's going to depend partly on whether you run across the
>> (relatively rare) case where the precedence difference between {} and
>> do/end actually matters.  There are also some interesting ideas on
>> record (see archives) involving blocks with side effects vs. blocks
>> that just calculate.  But I can't remember which is supposed to be
>> which :-)
>
> I have yet to see a practical case where the precedence actually came
> into play -- and I suspect that, when I do finally see such a thing,
> readability would benefit from a refactor so that it doesn't come into
> play after all.

assert_not_nil @enum.find do
   # ... a few lines of search code here ...
end

You need to switch block styles, add some parenthesis, or separate  
the two calls.

James Edward Gray II