From: Phrogz <gavin@...>
Date: 2007-06-12T04:05:07+09:00
Subject: Re: newbie question about Ri

On Jun 11, 12:54 pm, "Jano Svitok" <jan.svi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6/11/07, Phrogz <g...@refinery.com> wrote:
> > ...except that in the OP's problem, ruby-doc gets its information from
> > RDoc, and hence also has broken/missing information on String#tr
>
> Somehow ruby-doc.org has both definitions, empty tr and correct
> str.tr. RI picks the first.

Oops, mea culpa. I saw the empty definition and missed the full one. :)