From: seebs@... (Peter Seebach)
Date: 2007-06-11T20:37:08+09:00
Subject: Re: Prettier solution to circular dependency

In message <9bb72e130706102242y13e635d0ned1020d53376157a@mail.gmail.com>, "Helder Ribeiro" writ
es:
>The circular dependency hints at not having the module at all and just
>putting the instance method element_factory() into Element itself but
>there are those other two classes that include it, so I can't do that.
>
>Thanks a lot for any ideas! :-)

Forward declaration?

class Element
end

class ElementFactory
...
end

class Element
# actual content goes here!
end

-s