From: Jim Zhang <jim.zhang.china@...>
Date: 2007-06-01T17:15:07+09:00
Subject: Re: ruby vs perl6

------=_Part_3394_24138948.1180685702131
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Sorrry, Vision vs Vision?

Thanks,
Jim

2007/6/1, Anthony Gardner <cyclewood_ltd@yahoo.co.uk>:
>
> vision verses version?!
>
> I'm also a perl programmer and have played with ruby (like it) but there's
> nothing to compare with perl6 just yet. maybe later this year, n'est-ce
> pas?!
>
> Am looking forward to seeing perl6.
>
> Jim Zhang <jim.zhang.china@gmail.com> wrote: Hi,
>
> The reason to send this mail is that I am still wondering why I should
> study
> and use Ruby.
>
> I used perl for 5 years and recently I try to study and use Ruby...  I
> can't
> wait perl6 to relase.
>
> sb. says Ruby is an alternative for perl, but how's when compared with
> perl6? Ruby's vision vs Perl6's version?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Jim Zhang
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Tryit
> now.

------=_Part_3394_24138948.1180685702131--