From: Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Date: 2007-05-31T06:20:05+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] image_science 1.1.3 Released


On May 30, 2007, at 17:13 , Ball, Donald A Jr (Library) wrote:

> I had actually considered image_science as an
> alternative, but given the lack of an image_science gem that doesn't
> depend on having a c compiler on the box (a relative rarety in the  
> win32
> world, sadly), it's not an option for me.

More FUD! How many times I've heard this crap I have no idea... We've  
been shipping inline with inline_package for over 2 years now. How  
long do you have to propagate this?