From: "ara.t.howard" Date: 2007-05-28T06:23:36+09:00 Subject: Re: BackgrounDRb Theory On May 27, 2007, at 2:56 PM, Sy Ys wrote: > Ezra Zygmuntowicz wrote: >> Yeah I have the best luck with backgroundrb when I run a set number >> of immortal workers that just loop and pull jobs from a queue. > > How is this different from B? Why would rq be necessary for this? > it wouldn't be. i'll be bundling rq for rails in the next week or two. one advantage (i think) is that rq is durable across machine reboots and also allows commandline interaction. it's a different beast than backgrounddrb though. fyi. -a -- we can deny everything, except that we have the possibility of being better. simply reflect on that. h.h. the 14th dalai lama