From: Robert Dober <robert.dober@...>
Date: 2007-05-27T18:46:05+09:00
Subject: Re: Introducing the "it" keyword

On 5/27/07, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote:
<snip>
> >>
> > That is something I am surprised about, b/c the intention was to have
> > an idiom for
> > return it if h(x) < 10
>
> No, it's "return it if it < 10" with "it" being "v+1" in this case.
Well that was the original idiom but we are looking for existing ones, right?
>
> > and
> > return it_test(h(x))
> > really is not the same, right?
>
> It's not the same but I believe you misread the task.  it_test is just a
> method to demonstrate the idiom in lines 2-4.

Ah that's why you called the method test_..., not stupid at all ;)
Well I will get to understand what is going on here...
... eventually...
... potentially...
... maybe...
... hardly...

Cheers
Robert

>
> Kind regards
>
>         robert
>
>
Cheers
Robert

-- 
You see things; and you say Why?
But I dream things that never were; and I say Why not?
-- George Bernard Shaw