From: Rick DeNatale <rick.denatale@...>
Date: 2007-05-25T05:21:35+09:00
Subject: Re: temporary require ,is it possible?

On 5/24/07, Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@path.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> Brian Candler wrote:
> > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 06:03:22PM +0900, Gpy Good wrote:
> >> I have a idea,it is "temporary require"
> >> [code]
> >> module Find
> >>  # my define
> >> end
> >>
> >> tmp_require("find"){
> >>  #do something with "Find.find" method,temporary!!
> >> }
> >>
> >> puts Find # my define,no "Find.find" method
> >> [/code]
> >> Is it possible?
> >
> > Hmm, I was thinking of
> >
> >   temp = load("find.rb", true)
> >   temp::Find.find(...)
> >
> > but unfortunately load returns true, not the module object :-(
>
> There's a way around that. See
>
> http://redshift.sourceforge.net/script/
>
> No magic, just module_eval.
>
> (I'm not sure it solves the OP's problem, though.)

Somehow this smells to me like a job for Why's sandbox.
http://code.whytheluckystiff.net/sandbox/
-- 
Rick DeNatale

My blog on Ruby
http://talklikeaduck.denhaven2.com/