From: Brady Behrman Date: 2007-05-24T01:52:35+09:00 Subject: Re: require_gem vs. gem unsubscribe Brady Behrman (757) 271-8293 brady@vbwebsites.net http://www.VBWebSites.net -----Original Message----- From: Chris Carter [mailto:cdcarter@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 12:08 PM To: ruby-talk ML Subject: Re: require_gem vs. gem On 5/23/07, Dennis Crissman wrote: > I am confused, can somebody please explain to me the difference between > these two calls? > > I tried some variations below, and the only one that worked was the > obsolete require_gem call. > > ---------- > > user@vm0_gentoo /my/path $ irb -r rubygems > irb(main):001:0> require 'activerecord' > LoadError: no such file to load -- activerecord > from > /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in > `gem_original_require' > from > /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `require' > from (irb):1 > irb(main):002:0> exit > > ---------- > > user@vm0_gentoo /my/path $ irb -r rubygems > irb(main):001:0> gem 'activerecord' > => true > irb(main):002:0> ActiveRecord > NameError: uninitialized constant ActiveRecord > from (irb):2 > irb(main):003:0> exit > > ---------- > > user@vm0_gentoo /my/path $ irb -r rubygems > irb(main):001:0> gem 'activerecord','=1.14.4' > => true > irb(main):002:0> ActiveRecord > NameError: uninitialized constant ActiveRecord > from (irb):2 > irb(main):003:0> exit > > ---------- > > user@vm0_gentoo /my/path $ irb -r rubygems > irb(main):001:0> require_gem 'activerecord' > (irb):1:Warning: require_gem is obsolete. Use gem instead. > => true > irb(main):002:0> ActiveRecord > => ActiveRecord > > ---------- > > Any help you could offer would be appreciated. > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > > try require 'active_record' -- Chris Carter concentrationstudios.com brynmawrcs.com