From: "François Beausoleil" <francois.beausoleil@...>
Date: 2007-05-24T01:12:58+09:00
Subject: Re: require_gem vs. gem

Hi,
2007/5/23, Enrique Comba Riepenhausen <ecomba@mac.com>:> On 23 May 2007, at 17:29, Dennis Crissman wrote:> > user@vm0_gentoo /my/path $ irb -r rubygems> > irb(main):001:0> require 'activerecord'> > LoadError: no such file to load -- activerecord> >         from> > /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in> > `gem_original_require'> >         from> > /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/custom_require.rb:27:in `require'> >         from (irb):1> > irb(main):002:0> exit>> You should use the following now:>> require 'rubygems'> require 'activerecord'
Apparently, it didn't solve Enrique's problem.
Enrique, I believe the way to do it now is:
require "rubygems"gem "activerecord", "= 0.14.4"require "activerecord"
The #gem call activates the gem, and the require is the regularrequire to load a library.
Hope that helps !-- François Beausoleilhttp://blog.teksol.info/http://piston.rubyforge.org/