From: Stefan Rusterholz <apeiros@...>
Date: 2007-05-18T23:22:10+09:00
Subject: Re: Why does Array#first not use rb_ary_subseq?

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> In message "Re: Why does Array#first not use rb_ary_subseq?"
>     on Fri, 18 May 2007 22:35:08 +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto 
> <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:
> 
> |Just because it is just an implementation matter.  Anyway, I will
> |examine your code example, and check what we can do.
> 
> I am sorry, I was bit confused with 1.9 (trunk) and 1.8 which you are
> talking about.  You are right.  Array#first should utilize
> copy-on-write as much as it can.  I will fix.
> 
>               matz.

Oh, I should have supplied the version. Sorry about that.
Heh, actually I'm surprised that my curiosity results in a change in 
code, but happy to be of help :)

Regards
Stefan

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.