From: Peter Booth Date: 2007-05-15T03:03:15+09:00 Subject: Re: Defending Ruby's OOP Remind him that Ruby is, of course, superior to all other languages because it is red. On May 10, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Lucas Holland wrote: > Hi, > > I've got someone here saying that Ruby (and other languages) can't be > 100% object-oriented because if and unless and so on (keywords) are no > objects. > > How can I defend the claim that Ruby is 100% OOP? > > -- > Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. > Peter Booth peter_booth@mac.com 917 445 5663