From: Enrique Comba Riepenhausen <ecomba@...>
Date: 2007-05-11T16:04:03+09:00
Subject: Re: Defending Ruby's OOP

> On 10.05.2007 21:51, Gary Wright wrote:
>> On May 10, 2007, at 3:39 PM, Jason Roelofs wrote:
>>> Or better yet, tell him to design a language that has "if"  
>>> "unless" etc as
>>> objects and see where that goes. What does having if/unless as  
>>> objects even
>>> mean?
>> In Smalltalk, if-then-else is a message and messages are objects....
>> If Ruby is 100% OOP, then what is Smalltalk?
>
> Probably more in the 120% area. ;-)
>
> 	robert
>

LOL... That makes Smalltalk somehow metaphysical... It's like saying  
I am 120% human... That is 20% more human than a human can be....  
scary :P

Enrique Comba Riepenhausen