From: Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...>
Date: 2007-05-11T16:00:18+09:00
Subject: Re: Defending Ruby's OOP

On 10.05.2007 21:51, Gary Wright wrote:
> 
> On May 10, 2007, at 3:39 PM, Jason Roelofs wrote:
>> Or better yet, tell him to design a language that has "if" "unless" 
>> etc as
>> objects and see where that goes. What does having if/unless as objects 
>> even
>> mean?
> 
> In Smalltalk, if-then-else is a message and messages are objects....
> 
> If Ruby is 100% OOP, then what is Smalltalk?

Probably more in the 120% area. ;-)

	robert