From: Gregory Brown <gregory.t.brown@...>
Date: 2007-05-11T05:13:03+09:00
Subject: Re: Defending Ruby's OOP

On 5/10/07, Giles Bowkett <gilesb@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Tell him to find a more substantial argument. That's the lamest complaint I
> > think I've ever heard about Ruby or dynamic languages in general.
> >
> > Or better yet, tell him to design a language that has "if" "unless" etc as
> > objects and see where that goes. What does having if/unless as objects even
> > mean?
>
> It's like saying the car is inferior to the horse because you can't
> feed the car oats.

I'm patiently waiting for the Oatsmobile.