From: Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...>
Date: 2007-05-11T04:51:50+09:00
Subject: Re: Defending Ruby's OOP


On May 10, 2007, at 3:39 PM, Jason Roelofs wrote:
> Or better yet, tell him to design a language that has "if" "unless"  
> etc as
> objects and see where that goes. What does having if/unless as  
> objects even
> mean?

In Smalltalk, if-then-else is a message and messages are objects....

If Ruby is 100% OOP, then what is Smalltalk?

Gary Wright