From: Codeblogger <codeblogger@...>
Date: 2007-05-11T04:45:40+09:00
Subject: Re: Defending Ruby's OOP

------=_Part_156114_10490987.1178826336499
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

> I've got someone here saying that Ruby (and other languages) can't be
> 100% object-oriented because if and unless and so on (keywords) are no
> objects.
>
> How can I defend the claim that Ruby is 100% OOP?


You don't need to defend yourself. Tell your friend he hasn't understood OOP
yet.
OO does not mean you need to programming everything with method calls but
containing certain aspects in objects. It's about software design and not
control logic.

Kind regards
Nicolai

------=_Part_156114_10490987.1178826336499--