From: Lucas Holland <hollandlucas@...>
Date: 2007-05-11T04:26:15+09:00
Subject: Defending Ruby's OOP

Hi,

I've got someone here saying that Ruby (and other languages) can't be
100% object-oriented because if and unless and so on (keywords) are no
objects.

How can I defend the claim that Ruby is 100% OOP?

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.