From: Jeremy Hinegardner Date: 2007-05-05T09:20:59+09:00 Subject: Re: Beyond YAML? (scaling) On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 11:45:05PM +0900, Bil Kleb wrote: > khaines@enigo.com wrote: > > > >I guess that depends on whether you need the files to be easily readable > >or not. If you don't, Marshal will be faster than YAML. > > At this point, I'm looking for an easy out that will > reduce size and increase speed, and I'm willing to > go binary if necessary. If you want to describe your data needs a bit, and what operations you need to operate on it, I'll be happy to play around with an ruby/sqlite3 program and see what pops out. Since there's no Ruby Quiz this weekend, we all need something to work on :-). enjoy, -jeremy -- ======================================================================== Jeremy Hinegardner jeremy@hinegardner.org