From: Phillip Gawlowski <cmdjackryan@...>
Date: 2007-04-26T04:04:12+09:00
Subject: Re: DHH vs. WHY style

Trans wrote:

> To clarify here is my specific scenario. I've narrowed it down, more-
> or-less, to these Whyish vs. DHHish possibilities:
> 
>   Aces        Facets/CORE
>   Jacks       Facets/BASE
>   Tapestry    Facets/AOP
>   Comrade     Facets/CLI
>   Fileside    Facets/FS
>   Annote      Facets/ANN

FacetsCore
FacetsBase
FacetsAOP #(if that is an acronym)
FactesFileside
FacetsAnnote

or turn that around:
CoreFacets
BaseFacets
AOPFacets
FilesideFacets
AnnotateFacets

This seems to be the most pronounceable to me, and leaves room for 
others. You should go with the Rails way, as you have a common framework 
already (facets) in use, and keeping the name facets makes transition 
easier for the existing user base.

My 0.02EUR

-- 
Phillip "CynicalRyan" Gawlowski
http://cynicalryan.110mb.com/
http://clothred.rubyforge.org

Rule of Open-Source Programming #5:

A project is never finished.