From: Tim Pease Date: 2007-04-25T04:43:26+09:00 Subject: Re: Question about tempfile.rb - Ruby vs C On 4/24/07, Daniel Berger wrote: > Hi all, > > Just curious - why was Ruby's temporary file handling class > (tempfile.rb) written in pure Ruby instead of using the tmpfile() > function? That function appears to be supported on most platforms, > including MS Windows. > > Are there file locking or threading issues I'm not aware of? > > The tmpfile() function does have the advantage of deleting itself when > all references to it are gone, instead of waiting until the Ruby > process itself dies. Perhaps there's no real advantage to that, > though? > The Ruby Tempfile class creates a finalizer that will delete the temp file when it is collected by the garbage collector; the Ruby Tempfile also deletes the temp file when it is closed. Your paragraph above makes it sound like this is not the case. > Like I said, not an issue, just curious. I do not know why the C tmpfile function was not used. Maybe Matz likes programming in Ruby more than programming in C ;) Blessings, TwP