From: Sebastian Hungerecker <sepp2k@...>
Date: 2007-04-07T06:07:11+09:00
Subject: Re: Getting to 100 (#119)

Phrogz wrote:
> On Apr 6, 1:53 pm, Carlos <a...@quovadis.com.ar> wrote:

> > Can the plus and minus symbols be used as unary operators?
> [...]
> but I don't see any reason to disallow that sort of extra logic if you
> want to do it.

Well, one reason would be that using a plus as a unary operator is the
same as not using it at all, so that would allow you to circumvent the
use-all-operators-rule.


-- 
Ist so, weil ist so
Bleibt so, weil war so