From: Mike Stok <mike@...>
Date: 2007-04-04T22:09:38+09:00
Subject: Re: Why SVN?


On 4-Apr-07, at 8:38 AM, Ollivier Robert wrote:

> MenTaLguY wrote:
>> In my experience that isn't really true -- git has much better merge
>> tracking than svn, so repeated merges on long-lived branches are
>> substantially less painful with git.
>
> Yes, this is a major drawback of current svn (although svk sorta fixes
> that problem). svn has more problems anyway :-)
>
> Disclaimer: I'm the author of a paper on using dVCS on FreeBSD with
> focus on Arch & Mercurial.

Is this paper available anywhere?

Mike

-- 

Mike Stok <mike@stok.ca>
http://www.stok.ca/~mike/

The "`Stok' disclaimers" apply.