From: Ollivier Robert <keltia@...>
Date: 2007-04-04T21:38:58+09:00
Subject: Re: Why SVN?

MenTaLguY wrote:
> In my experience that isn't really true -- git has much better merge 
> tracking than svn, so repeated merges on long-lived branches are 
> substantially less painful with git.

Yes, this is a major drawback of current svn (although svk sorta fixes 
that problem). svn has more problems anyway :-)

Disclaimer: I'm the author of a paper on using dVCS on FreeBSD with 
focus on Arch & Mercurial.


-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.