From: Ken Mitchell <kmitchell@...>
Date: 2007-04-03T06:43:16+09:00
Subject: Re: Nested Modules/Classes

Brian Candler wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 06:02:41AM +0900, Ken Mitchell wrote:
>>     end
>> ->test.rb:22: undefined local variable or method 'print_test' for
>> Global:Class
>> 
>> Whether "Global" is a Class or a Method the same happens.  However, if I
>> comment out "Global" completely, out put is as expected:
>> 
>> ->test1
>> ->test2
> 
> If you 'include' a module in a class, its methods are added as instance
> methods for objects of that class. Try:
> 
> a = Global.new
> a.print_test

Thank you two!  See, I knew it would be simple and now it even makes 
sense.

So in the context of the above, my application will be performing a wide 
range of work and will need to be quite modular (ok I'm lazy).  As far 
as preference and "best practice", how would I best layout the 
namespace.  For instance:

#/lib/testapp.rb
#/lib/testapp/config.rb
#/lib/testapp/logger.rb

maybe this....

module Testapp
  module config
  end

  class logger
  end
end

Looking through included source, I see this done so many different ways. 
What is the best.  Thanks so much

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.