From: Greg Hurrell Date: 2007-03-08T11:00:06+09:00 Subject: Re: Making "require" just work with some dynamic load path manipulation On 7 mar, 22:01, "Trans" wrote: > Is there a reason you are not using setup.rb and/or gems? > > T. Neither of those is really appropriate because the files "a.rb" and "b.rb" are dynamically generated and probably not very long lived (the typical cycle will be: generate, use, throw away) and definitely not worth installing permanently. The thing that generates those files is actually distributed as a gem so there are no problems at that level; I just want the generated files to be as easy to use for end users as possible. Cheers, Greg