From: Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
Date: 2007-03-01T08:02:15+09:00
Subject: Re: PlanMachine9 - any interest?

Robert Dober wrote:
> On 2/28/07, Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On 28.02.2007 17:22, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
>> > Hi --
>> >
>> > On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, Robert Klemme wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 28.02.2007 00:38, Chad Perrin wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 08:34:39AM +0900, Glen Holcomb wrote:
>> >>>> Or Plan10 depending on how you want to pun it.
>> >>>
>> >>> I thought about that, but that might be used as the name for a later
>> >>> version of the OS, too.
>> >>
>> >> I opt for "Plan9.5". :-)
>> >
>> > How about PlanNein? :-)
>>
>> Oh nein!
>>
>> > (Not a judgment, just a pun.)
>>
>> Dito. ;-)
>>
>>         robert
>>
>>
> Plan 27 than, who knows why?

Plan42 is the Answer, but it will take a larger brain, whose very 
operational parameters I am not worthy to compute, to come up with the 
Question ;)

-- 
       vjoel : Joel VanderWerf : path berkeley edu : 510 665 3407