From: Nat Pryce <nat.pryce@...13media.com>
Date: 2001-11-01T06:20:00+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:24035] Re: Test::Unit = Lapidary + RubyUnit

Sounds great.  I have a number of improvements I want to make, but I'd
rather start on those after any integration work has been done.

Cheers,
            Nat.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@rolemodelsoft.com>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 8:01 PM
Subject: [ruby-talk:24025] Re: Test::Unit = Lapidary + RubyUnit


> > Excellent news!  What can I do to integrate Ruby/Mock  into
> > the new package?
>
> I'm working on getting things settled down and figuring out the overall
> merger strategy. Lapidary 0.3.0 will be the candidate for Test::Unit, so
> once I release that, you'll probably want to do whatever needs to be
> done to Ruby/Mock to make the integration with 0.3.0 as clean as
> possible. As soon as you're ready, we'll include Ruby/Mock in the
> standard release, and it will move into the Ruby code base as soon as
> Test::Unit does. I can also give you CVS access to wherever it ends up
> being hosted so that you can continue to maintain and improve Ruby/Mock.
>
> Does that sound workable? Any further questions or comments?
>
>
> Nathaniel
>
> <:((><
> + - -
> | RoleModel Software, Inc.
> | EQUIP VI
>
>
>