From: Mark Hahn <mchahn@...>
Date: 2001-11-01T02:41:18+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:23993] Re: Overiding a method in another module


Correct.  It is not needed.

C1 = Object... is more readable in my opinion.  It does exactly what I
wanted.  Any statement that starts with a . or :: is confusing to me.

-----Original Message-----
From: ts [mailto:decoux@moulon.inra.fr]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:32 AM
To: ruby-talk ML
Cc: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
Subject: [ruby-talk:23990] Re: Overiding a method in another module


>>>>> "M" == Mark Hahn <mchahn@facelink.com> writes:

M> Thanks.  I like this solution more then the eval solution.   I suspect
that
M> anything is possible in Ruby.


 This means that

  class ::M1::C1
  end

 is not really usefull, no ? :-)))


Guy Decoux