From: chad fowler <chadfowler@...>
Date: 2001-10-31T19:40:00+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:23931] Re: Test::Unit = Lapidary + RubyUnit


--- Nathaniel Talbott <ntalbott@rolemodelsoft.com>
wrote:
> I've been in discussions with Masaki Suketa and Ken
> McKinlay about the
> different developer testing frameworks that exist,
> and what the future
> should look like as we try to get a framework into
> the standard
> distribution. Masaki has (very graciously) agreed to
> have RubyUnit merge
> into Lapidary, and then the resulting framework,
> which will probably be
> named something simple like Test::Unit, will go into
> the Ruby proper.
> The current plan is for me to write an runit
> compatibility layer for
> Lapidary, which I've already begun, and then release
> it along with some
> fairly deep changes in Lapidary 0.3.0. After
> everyone says they like it
> (including whatever revisions are necessary), we'll
> move it into the
> distribution.
> 

Excellent news!  I'm very excited as well.  Just to
make sure I understand this right, Lapidary tests will
continue to work unchanged, right?


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com