From: Robert Dober Date: 2007-02-14T01:19:07+09:00 Subject: Re: [OT] the funniest thing ever ------=_Part_84990_7925166.1171383544404 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On 2/13/07, Tim Pease wrote: > > On 2/13/07, Richard Conroy wrote: > > On 2/13/07, Clifford Heath wrote: > > > Richard Conroy wrote: > > > > It has some fantastic features at the language > > > > design level. We are talking drool-worthy. And absolutely no library > > > > to speak of. > > > > And you have to love the Ruby community Well, I do :) where an off-topic humor > thread starts espousing the wonders of the ocaml language. I remember > a similar thing happening on a previous thread comparing Ruby and > Python. It, too, ended up discussing how the wonders of ocaml. But is that not a well known law(n)? 42nd law of the dynamics of language discussion: All discussions eventually orbit O?Caml! TwP > > Robert -- We have not succeeded in answering all of our questions. In fact, in some ways, we are more confused than ever. But we feel we are confused on a higher level and about more important things. -Anonymous ------=_Part_84990_7925166.1171383544404--