From: Robert Feldt <feldt@...>
Date: 2001-10-30T23:10:23+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:23844] Re: RubyGems Status (was: Re: Someinspirations from REBOL)

On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Dave Thomas wrote:

> it struck me that it was more natural to put that relationship
> separate from the Gem name:
> 
>    dependsOn     Gem("RyansCoolGem") >= V(0, 0, 2)
> 
>    conflictsWith Gem("RyansCoolGem") >= V(0, 0, 2)
> 
>    recommends    Gem("RyansCoolGem") >= V(0, 0, 2)
> 
Now I see what you mean. Cool!

/Robert