[#21872] Let's work on Windows support — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

98 messages 2001/10/01
[#21957] Re: Let's work on Windows support — "Benoit Cerrina" <benoit.cerrina@...> 2001/10/02

> I seem to remember that versions of Python compiled with MinGW can't have

[#21960] Re: Let's work on Windows support — "Furio R. Filoseta (tlf.)" <furifilo901@...> 2001/10/02

I am just a developer, not a Guru, but it seems to me that the .NET way

[#21963] Re: Let's work on Windows support — Albert Wagner <alwagner@...> 2001/10/03

On Tuesday 02 October 2001 18:20, you wrote:

[#21965] Re: Let's work on Windows support — "Furio R. Filoseta (tlf.)" <furifilo901@...> 2001/10/03

Come on, for Ruby developers in Windows environment. You may as well be

[#21969] Re: Let's work on Windows support — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/10/03

Hello --

[#22153] Re: Let's work on Windows support — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2001/10/06

Hi,

[#22154] Re: Let's work on Windows support — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/10/06

Hello --

[#22167] Re: Let's work on Windows support — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/10/06

On Sat, 6 Oct 2001, David Alan Black wrote:

[#22183] Re: Let's work on Windows support — "Furio R. Filoseta (tlf.)" <furifilo901@...> 2001/10/07

Who cares if they ditch the standard ? They will still have to be self

[#21959] Flogging a live Window — Eli Green <eli.green@...>

Ok, I wanted to get away from the theory and conjecture thread of the

23 messages 2001/10/02

[#22003] Marshal won't dump a Proc — "HarryO" <harryo@...>

I would really like to be able to dump a block of code via Marshal#dump,

17 messages 2001/10/03

[#22107] The Windows question still remains... — Robert Hicks <bobhicks@...>

VC++

17 messages 2001/10/04
[#22111] Re: The Windows question still remains... — Robert Hicks <bobhicks@...> 2001/10/05

Shan-leung Maverick WOO wrote:

[#22166] dRuby, Linux and ports — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

13 messages 2001/10/06

[#22219] - BRITNEY SPEARS NAKED----WOW!!!!!! — -.597i1468vn4848nc3958vn32858238@...

BRITNEY SPEARS COCK SUCKING VIDEO---EXCLUSIVE!!!

19 messages 2001/10/08

[#22257] [Newbie] Switching from Perl : suffling — Damien WYART <damien.wyart@...>

Dear All,

13 messages 2001/10/08

[#22299] Re: Less than 4 days now... — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

>> Is everyone ready for the

27 messages 2001/10/09
[#22300] Re: Less than 4 days now... — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/09

Hi,

[#22310] Re: Less than 4 days now... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/10/09

"Hal E. Fulton" <hal9000@hypermetrics.com> writes:

[#22316] Re: Less than 4 days now... — Todd Gillespie <toddg@...> 2001/10/09

On Tue, 9 Oct 2001, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#22320] Re: Less than 4 days now... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/10/09

Todd Gillespie <toddg@mail.ma.utexas.edu> writes:

[#22347] Re: Less than 4 days now... — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/09

On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Dave Thomas wrote:

[#22325] blocks with min and max — Mark Slagell <ms@...>

I don't know if this has been raised before, but I'd like to be able to

17 messages 2001/10/09

[#22405] list comprehensions alike Python ??? — markus jais <info@...>

hello

20 messages 2001/10/10
[#22407] Re: list comprehensions alike Python ??? — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/10

On Thu, 11 Oct 2001, markus jais wrote:

[#22411] Re: list comprehensions alike Python ??? — Paul Prescod <paul@...> 2001/10/11

Robert Feldt wrote:

[#22432] OSSL opinion — Michal Rokos <rokosm@...>

Hello!

16 messages 2001/10/11

[#22465] Learn Ruby/Tk or Ruby/GTK? && Problems with these. — "dAHen" <steensland@...>

Hi!

45 messages 2001/10/12
[#22472] Re: Learn Ruby/Tk or Ruby/GTK? && Problems with these. — "dAHen" <steensland@...> 2001/10/12

ts> No, you just need to have the header files and libraries for tcl/tk and

[#22520] Re: Learn Ruby/Tk or Ruby/GTK? — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...> 2001/10/14

--- dAHen <steensland@hotmail.com> wrote:

[#22613] Re: Learn Ruby/Tk or Ruby/GTK? — stesch@... (Stefan Scholl) 2001/10/16

On 2001-10-15 19:58:29Z, Christopher Sawtell <csawtell@paradise.net.nz> wrote:

[#22625] Re: Learn Ruby/Tk or Ruby/GTK? — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...> 2001/10/16

--- Stefan Scholl <stesch@no-spoon.de> wrote:

[#22632] Re: Learn Ruby/Tk or Ruby/GTK? — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/10/16

[#22645] What about FLTK? — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/10/16

[#22652] Re: What about FLTK? — Kevin Smith <kevinbsmith@...> 2001/10/17

--- Mark Hahn <mchahn@facelink.com> wrote:

[#22656] Re: What about FLTK? — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/10/17

That's good to know. It makes me more comfortable to proceed assuming FLTK.

[#22494] extracting from delimited text files — Albert Wagner <alwagner@...>

What is the simplist way to extract fields from standard quoted, comma

23 messages 2001/10/13
[#22496] Re: extracting from delimited text files — Robert Linder <robert_linder_2000@...> 2001/10/13

Check out http://ruby.yi.org/raa/en/all.html

[#22502] Open-ended ranges — Sean Russell <ser@...>

Before I post an RCR on this, I'd like to solicit information from the more

11 messages 2001/10/14
[#22503] Re: Open-ended ranges — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/14

On Sun, 14 Oct 2001, Sean Russell wrote:

[#22766] ANN: RuEdit - introspective Ruby editor — phlip_cpp@... (Phlip)

Here's the README file from http://sourceforge.net/projects/ruedit :

31 messages 2001/10/19

[#22769] How to Convert String to Regex to Perform Exact Match — William Djaja Tjokroaminata <billtj@...>

Hi,

10 messages 2001/10/19

[#22867] RE: I need some help!! — Mikkel Bruun <mikkel.bruun@...>

uhhmm...

14 messages 2001/10/21
[#22883] Re: I need some help!! — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2001/10/21

Mikkel Bruun wrote:

[#22886] Re: I need some help!! — "Avdi B. Grimm" <avdi@...> 2001/10/21

On Sun, 2001-10-21 at 15:26, Tobias Reif wrote:

[#22871] Preaching Ruby to the masses. How? — Kent Dahl <kentda@...>

Hi.

17 messages 2001/10/21

[#23063] Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...>

Ouch!

178 messages 2001/10/23
[#23076] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Eric Lee Green <eric@...> 2001/10/23

On Tuesday 23 October 2001 11:20, you wrote:

[#23084] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Michael Neumann <neumann@...> 2001/10/23

Eric Lee Green wrote:

[#23087] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Eric Lee Green <eric@...> 2001/10/23

On Tuesday 23 October 2001 13:25, you wrote:

[#23088] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/23

On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Eric Lee Green wrote:

[#23096] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...> 2001/10/23

[#23099] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/23

On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Rich Kilmer wrote:

[#23090] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...> 2001/10/23

On Wed, 24 Oct 2001, Michael Neumann wrote:

[#23085] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/23

Hi Eric and thanks for your detailed comments,

[#23119] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/10/23

Eric Lee Green wrote:

[#23141] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Emiliano <emile@...> 2001/10/24

Sean Russell wrote:

[#23219] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/10/24

Emiliano wrote:

[#23221] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Emiliano <emile@...> 2001/10/24

Sean Russell wrote:

[#23259] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/10/25

Emiliano wrote:

[#23264] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Emiliano <emile@...> 2001/10/25

Sean Russell wrote:

[#23439] Re: Issues with white space [was Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby] — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/10/26

Raja S. wrote:

[#23447] Re: Issues with white space [was Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby] — ts <decoux@...> 2001/10/26

>>>>> "S" == Sean Russell <ser@efn.org> writes:

[#23108] Re: Bruce Eckel's opinion of Ruby — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2001/10/23

Emiliano wrote:

[#23214] () vs (...) in header files — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>

There is a serious problem with including ruby.h and intern.h in C++

14 messages 2001/10/24
[#23283] Re: () vs (...) in header files — ts <decoux@...> 2001/10/25

>>>>> "P" == Paul Brannan <pbrannan@atdesk.com> writes:

[#23248] [ANN] RubyInRubyParser 0.1-pre-alpha — markus liedl <markus.lado@...>

53 messages 2001/10/25
[#23323] Re: [ANN] RubyInRubyParser 0.1-pre-alpha — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson) 2001/10/25

In article <5.1.0.14.0.20011025083950.00bc30b0@mercury.sabren.com>,

[#23336] Re: [ANN] RubyInRubyParser 0.1-pre-alpha — Jimmy Thrasher <jjthrash@...> 2001/10/25

At 02:54 AM 10/26/2001 +0900, you wrote:

[#23350] Re: GUI / was [ANN] RubyInRubyParser 0.1-pre-alpha — markus liedl <markus.lado@...> 2001/10/25

> having a native window with a canvas which Ruby draws on using the BitBlt

[#23355] Re: GUI / was [ANN] RubyInRubyParser 0.1-pre-alpha — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...> 2001/10/25

I wrote a sophisticated lightweight component framework on Java (before Swing) that was very fast. Of course, writing it in a "higher level" language adds overhead, but not as much overhead as bad design ;-) If you could have low-level primitives written natively and layer higher level constructs with Ruby, I think you could build a very responsive UI.

[#23369] Re: GUI / was [ANN] RubyInRubyParser 0.1-pre-alpha — Eli Green <eli.green@...> 2001/10/25

I never understood why Swing was so slow. I do know, however, that Swing is

[#23371] Re: GUI / was [ANN] RubyInRubyParser 0.1-pre-alpha — Avi Bryant <avi@...4.com> 2001/10/25

On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Eli Green wrote:

[#23261] Ruby macros — Leo <lraz@...>

Hi Ruby experts,

19 messages 2001/10/25

[#23318] class Foo does not call Class.new? — Brian Marick <marick@...>

It seems that this:

25 messages 2001/10/25
[#23358] Re: class Foo does not call Class.new? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/10/25

Hi,

[#23360] Re: class Foo does not call Class.new? — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/10/25

Hello --

[#23395] Re: class Foo does not call Class.new? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/10/26

Hi,

[#23680] Re: ref. constructors and new (was: Re: class Foo does not call Class.new?) — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/10/28

Hello --

[#23396] Ruby and Python: a fuzzy question — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

37 messages 2001/10/26
[#23406] Re: Ruby and Python: a fuzzy question — "F. GEIGER" <fgeiger@...> 2001/10/26

Python and Ruby both are write/read scripting languages, which are in one or

[#23544] Fast reply needed: class var trouble — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Ok its getting late over here in sweden and I'm tired. Can someone please

21 messages 2001/10/26
[#23548] RE: Fast reply needed: class var trouble — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...> 2001/10/26

[#23555] Re: Fast reply needed: class var trouble — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/26

On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Rich Kilmer wrote:

[#23557] Re: Fast reply needed: class var trouble — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...> 2001/10/26

because you defined:

[#23558] Re: Fast reply needed: class var trouble — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/26

On Sat, 27 Oct 2001, Rich Kilmer wrote:

[#23561] Re: Fast reply needed: class var trouble — "Ralph Mason" <ralph.mason@...> 2001/10/26

I would rather have the option to require declaration of all variables.

[#23619] sleeping, calling methods inside class defs — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...>

ruby 1.6.3 (2001-03-19) [i386-cygwin]

15 messages 2001/10/27
[#23621] Re: sleeping, calling methods inside class defs — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/10/27

Hello --

[#23658] How to get a String to interpolate itself? — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

11 messages 2001/10/28

[#23668] Ruby's use of cygwin and commercial use! — Sunil Hadap <hadap@...>

Hi,

23 messages 2001/10/28
[#23865] Re: Ruby's use of cygwin and commercial use! — "Benoit Cerrina" <benoit.cerrina@...> 2001/10/30

[#23866] Overiding a method in another module — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/10/30

I want to write a module that overrides a method in another module. I have

[#23885] RE: Overiding a method in another module — "Mark Hahn" <mchahn@...> 2001/10/31

[#23893] Re: Overiding a method in another module — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2001/10/31

Hello --

[#23713] Some inspirations from REBOL — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

42 messages 2001/10/29
[#23735] RE: Some inspirations from REBOL — "Ryan Leavengood" <mrcode@...> 2001/10/29

> However, it's got some nice properties that my friend has been

[#23738] Re: Some inspirations from REBOL — Michael Neumann <neumann@...> 2001/10/29

Ryan Leavengood wrote:

[#23764] Re: Some inspirations from REBOL — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/29

On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Ryan Leavengood wrote:

[#23769] RubyGems Status (was: Re: Some inspirations from REBOL) — "Ryan Leavengood" <mrcode@...> 2001/10/29

> Any news on RubyGems? I'm not pushing you just wanting a status report

[#23773] Re: RubyGems Status (was: Re: Some inspirations from REBOL) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/29

On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Ryan Leavengood wrote:

[#23779] Re: RubyGems Status (was: Re: Some inspirations from REBOL) — "Ryan Leavengood" <mrcode@...> 2001/10/29

> Release to CVS as quickly as possible!

[#23783] Re: RubyGems Status (was: Re: Some inspirations from REBOL) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...> 2001/10/29

On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Ryan Leavengood wrote:

[#23786] Re: RubyGems Status (was: Re: Some inspirations from REBOL) — Neil Conway <nconway@...> 2001/10/30

On Mon, 2001-10-29 at 18:56, Robert Feldt wrote:

[#23793] Re: RubyGems Status (was: Re: Someinspirations from REBOL) — "Rich Kilmer" <rich@...> 2001/10/30

OK...here's an idea for making a Gem a Ruby executable file...

[#23768] RCR: Fun with attribute shortcuts solves RCR #3 and more — Gunnar Andersson <dff180@...>

Hi everyone, remember this?

19 messages 2001/10/29

[#23868] Re: Ruby's use of cygwin and commercial use! — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

Benoit says:

14 messages 2001/10/30

[#23876] New RubyGarden Poll: Windows support — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

28 messages 2001/10/30
[#23891] Re: New RubyGarden Poll: Windows support — "Nat Pryce" <nat.pryce@...13media.com> 2001/10/31

Please! Don't vote for what you think will win. Vote for what you actually

[#23896] Re: New RubyGarden Poll: Windows support — "Curt Hibbs" <curt@...> 2001/10/31

What would MinGW buy us over straight MSVC? Since MinGW ultimately uses the

[#23915] Re: New RubyGarden Poll: Windows support — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson) 2001/10/31

In article <NCBBJBPADKGIOFLDNEALMEHKFFAA.curt@hibbs.com>,

[#23882] RubyGems Discussion — "Ryan Leavengood" <RyanL@...>

Wow, there has been a lot of discussion related to RubyGems over the

19 messages 2001/10/30

[#23904] Test::Unit = Lapidary + RubyUnit — "Nathaniel Talbott" <ntalbott@...>

I've been in discussions with Masaki Suketa and Ken McKinlay about the

12 messages 2001/10/31

[#23959] Creating charts from Ruby — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

16 messages 2001/10/31

[ruby-talk:23834] Re: Probably a simple one

From: David Alan Black <dblack@...>
Date: 2001-10-30 11:37:27 UTC
List: ruby-talk #23834
Hello --

(Disclaimer: I am aware of the fact that HTML cannot be parsed with a
single regular expression.  I just want to help the guy grasp the
syntax :-)

On Tue, 30 Oct 2001, Ralph Mason wrote:

> Thanks Joe,
>
> I can see how your expression works however I still mystified by the
> behavior of my one.
>
> If  .* will just keep matching to the end of the line then my version should
> have returned nil as the whole expression would never have been matched.
> But it didn't
>
> I have just been playing with this
>
> z="abc"
> z=/(.*b)/    => 0
> $1  => "ab"
> z=~/(.*)b/ => 0
> $1  => "a"
>
> So it seems that .* is matching in this case until it finds the character
> following. But in the example below it doesn't.  It seems to randomly stop.

No, it stops at exactly the point you've asked it to :-)

> > RM> s="<A  href=\"l.htm\">xxx <IMG  src=\"images/la.gif\" width=4></A>"
> > RM> s =~ /<.*A.*href *= *"(.*)".*>/   => 0
> > $1   =>>  "l.htm\">xxx <IMG  src=\"images/la.gif"

This part of your pattern:

    "(.*)"

means:

    a double quote, followed by zero or more of any character (except newline),
    followed by another double quote.

and it saves the "zero or more..." part to $1, because that's what the
parens are around.

Note that .* matches are "greedy".  That is, the match goes as far
along in the string as it can and still succeed in matching.  "Zero or
more" is really "as many as possible".  It has to stop consuming
characters when it gets to the last double quote, because if it
consumes that, the match will fail (because the match calls for a
double quote *after* the .* part).  But it can consume all the double
quotes prior to the last one.

You can do a "non-greedy" match using /.*?/ instead of /.*/.  For example:

s="<A  href=\"l.htm\">xxx <IMG  src=\"images/la.gif\" width=4></A>"
s =~ /<.*A.*href *= *"(.*?)".*>/

  # $1 =>  l.htm


David

-- 
David Alan Black
home: dblack@candle.superlink.net
work: blackdav@shu.edu
Web:  http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav


In This Thread

Prev Next