From: Diego Scataglini <dwebsubmit@...>
Date: 2007-02-07T13:18:45+09:00
Subject: Re: Posted Jim Weirich OSCON 2006 video presentation

------=_Part_15579_5769782.1170821923590
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

I believe one of the main differences is that DBC is more of a runtime
check.

On 2/6/07, Devin Mullins <twifkak@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> Trans wrote:
> > The more these test/specification/dbc system evolve the more they seem
> > like double-entry bookkeeping. Aren't we just writing the code twice
> > but from two differnt perspectives and seeing if they match up?
> Mostly, yes. (Though usually the test is a drastic simplification for a
> specific example.) Thrice if you do acceptance testing. Is that a bad
> thing?
>
> Devin
>
>


-- 
Diego Scataglini

------=_Part_15579_5769782.1170821923590--