From: gwtmp01@...
Date: 2007-02-06T09:04:28+09:00
Subject: Re: Code explanation requeted


On Feb 5, 2007, at 6:39 PM, dblack@wobblini.net wrote:
> What you're seeing in the code you've got is this, but strung together
> on one line without much to help you parse it visually if you don't
> already know what to expect.  I would tend to write it as:
>
>   (class << log; self; end).__send__  etc.

I'd add that

   __send__(:define_method, :to_int)

is used instead of simply:

   define_method(:to_int)

to override the private status of 'define_method'.

Gary Wright