From: Robert Dober <robert.dober@...>
Date: 2007-02-03T04:56:01+09:00
Subject: Re: Performance hit of define_method

------=_Part_27954_11293486.1170446158226
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

On 2/2/07, Chris Carter <cdcarter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/2/07, Robert Dober <robert.dober@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 2/2/07, Jon Egil Strand <jes@luretanker.no> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > <snip>
> >
> >
> > If you are doing this for fun, learning research, than  that's just
> great if
> > you need this stuff (and even for fun, learning and research ;) you
> might
> > want to have a look at Facet http://facets.rubyforge.org/doc.html
> > especially OpenStruct and OpenObject.
> >
> > Thomas if you are reading this and you are not too busy, why is
> OpenStruct
> > in Core and OpenObject in More? (is the former used much more often?)
> Just
> > curious ;)
> >
> > Cheers
> > Robert
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > We have not succeeded in answering all of our questions.
> > In fact, in some ways, we are more confused than ever.
> > But we feel we are confused on a higher level and about more important
> > things.
> > -Anonymous
> >
> >
>
> Hi Robert,
> It is because OpenStruct is in the ruby standard library,


Can you believe that! One never stops learning !!!
Sorry to correct you it is even in the Core. I thought I knew the Core API
BACK TO CLASS (and that is not Class ;)

and the
> facets OpenStruct is just a set of extensions to it.  OpenObject is a
> class made by Facets


Makes perfect sense, thx for the enlightment ;)

--
> Chris Carter
> concentrationstudios.com
> brynmawrcs.com
>
>
Robert

------=_Part_27954_11293486.1170446158226--