From: Sean Surname Date: 2007-01-30T01:44:44+09:00 Subject: Re: "ungem" script Mike Harris wrote: > Could you not just install with RubyGems and then invoke the absolute > path of the file manually, instead of requiring or using the RubyGems > bin wrapper? It's a little trickier than that. You need to (1) make modules available via ordinary 'require' instead of 'require_gem' (or whatever we like to use today), (2) prevent "require 'rubygems'" from insinuating rubygems into your program, and (3) still allow 'gem install foo' to work for module authors that insiste upon only distributing gems. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.